<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Earthquake Preparedness and a Reply to a Comment Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goodschist.com/2009/09/21/earthquake-preparedness-and-a-reply-to-a-comment-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goodschist.com/2009/09/21/earthquake-preparedness-and-a-reply-to-a-comment-online/</link>
	<description>geology and planetary science. done good.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:36:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sharla Shimono</title>
		<link>http://www.goodschist.com/2009/09/21/earthquake-preparedness-and-a-reply-to-a-comment-online/comment-page-1/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharla Shimono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodschist.com/?p=381#comment-1140</guid>
		<description>Bart Hanson’s comment displays an opinion probably shared by most who are not as well educated in the sciences and don’t understand the limits that restrict scientist ability to predict the occurrences of natural disasters. The idea of being able to closely monitor a natural disaster as it is happening, may be misleading as to why the occurrence of one can’t be predicted with the same accuracy. The comment posted by Erik states it best, as his example of watching the weather girl on TV showing projected routes of a hurricane, may lead someone to ask why can’t they declare the specific location, date and time of the next hurricane. What is not realized, is the fact that the observance of the natural disaster’s behavior only occurs once the disaster has formed, and not before. Our technology is limited to only modeling the situations that could cause a natural disaster, but the possible combinations of factors are too numerous for this to be a reliable source. 

Living in the southern California region, close to the San Andreas fault puts us at a greater risk for earthquakes, as well as the “big one” that is said to be long overdue.  This expectance is based off of previous patterns, and like much geologic activity operates on a time scale with decades of years of deviation.  During the first lecture of the Earthquakes class (GEOL 240) at the University of Southern California, we are taught about the unpredictability of earthquakes due to never knowing when the “snap” would occur. Geologists may be able to detect signs prior to an earthquake rupturing, but given the speed of an earthquake it’ll be too late to take any preventative measures. Your statement about being prepared for a natural disaster “Like not paying tax, not taking medication or indulging in smoking, you may think you’re getting away with it, but after a while, it could catch up with you, and the results could, literally, be deadly.” reflect the importance of being prepared.  These scientists have spent many years learning what they can to understand the Earth system, you can choose to question the authority they may have on these issues, but I am going to listen to the experts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bart Hanson’s comment displays an opinion probably shared by most who are not as well educated in the sciences and don’t understand the limits that restrict scientist ability to predict the occurrences of natural disasters. The idea of being able to closely monitor a natural disaster as it is happening, may be misleading as to why the occurrence of one can’t be predicted with the same accuracy. The comment posted by Erik states it best, as his example of watching the weather girl on TV showing projected routes of a hurricane, may lead someone to ask why can’t they declare the specific location, date and time of the next hurricane. What is not realized, is the fact that the observance of the natural disaster’s behavior only occurs once the disaster has formed, and not before. Our technology is limited to only modeling the situations that could cause a natural disaster, but the possible combinations of factors are too numerous for this to be a reliable source. </p>
<p>Living in the southern California region, close to the San Andreas fault puts us at a greater risk for earthquakes, as well as the “big one” that is said to be long overdue.  This expectance is based off of previous patterns, and like much geologic activity operates on a time scale with decades of years of deviation.  During the first lecture of the Earthquakes class (GEOL 240) at the University of Southern California, we are taught about the unpredictability of earthquakes due to never knowing when the “snap” would occur. Geologists may be able to detect signs prior to an earthquake rupturing, but given the speed of an earthquake it’ll be too late to take any preventative measures. Your statement about being prepared for a natural disaster “Like not paying tax, not taking medication or indulging in smoking, you may think you’re getting away with it, but after a while, it could catch up with you, and the results could, literally, be deadly.” reflect the importance of being prepared.  These scientists have spent many years learning what they can to understand the Earth system, you can choose to question the authority they may have on these issues, but I am going to listen to the experts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colo_kea (Kristen E. Asmus)</title>
		<link>http://www.goodschist.com/2009/09/21/earthquake-preparedness-and-a-reply-to-a-comment-online/comment-page-1/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>Colo_kea (Kristen E. Asmus)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodschist.com/?p=381#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>RT &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/Yorrike&quot;&gt;@Yorrike&lt;/a&gt;: Earthquake Preparedness and a Reply to a Comment Online http://bit.ly/wArzA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/Yorrike">@Yorrike</a>: Earthquake Preparedness and a Reply to a Comment Online <a href="http://bit.ly/wArzA" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/wArzA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.goodschist.com/2009/09/21/earthquake-preparedness-and-a-reply-to-a-comment-online/comment-page-1/#comment-1138</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodschist.com/?p=381#comment-1138</guid>
		<description>I think Bart Hanson is confused about predicting the occurrence of natural disasters (which we can&#039;t do well for a number of reasons) vs. predicting the behavior of ongoing natural disasters.

Seeing the weather girl on TV showing the projected path of the latest hurricane or the towns with tornado warnings for the next three hours is not the same as declaring that a hurricane or thunderstorm will probably occur at some specified date, time, and location in the distant future.  We can do a reasonably good job of predicting where landslides might occur, where liquefaction might occur, or which buildings might be unsafe in a given earthquake scenario just like we can issue storm warnings once we know that a storm is going on.  The problem is that earthquakes happen too fast for those kinds of specific event-specific warnings to ever be useful, hence the need for general preparedness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Bart Hanson is confused about predicting the occurrence of natural disasters (which we can&#8217;t do well for a number of reasons) vs. predicting the behavior of ongoing natural disasters.</p>
<p>Seeing the weather girl on TV showing the projected path of the latest hurricane or the towns with tornado warnings for the next three hours is not the same as declaring that a hurricane or thunderstorm will probably occur at some specified date, time, and location in the distant future.  We can do a reasonably good job of predicting where landslides might occur, where liquefaction might occur, or which buildings might be unsafe in a given earthquake scenario just like we can issue storm warnings once we know that a storm is going on.  The problem is that earthquakes happen too fast for those kinds of specific event-specific warnings to ever be useful, hence the need for general preparedness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention goodSchist » Earthquake Preparedness and a Reply to a Comment Online -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.goodschist.com/2009/09/21/earthquake-preparedness-and-a-reply-to-a-comment-online/comment-page-1/#comment-1137</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention goodSchist » Earthquake Preparedness and a Reply to a Comment Online -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodschist.com/?p=381#comment-1137</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Disaster Bob. Disaster Bob said: goodSchist » Earthquake Preparedness and a Reply to a Comment Online http://bit.ly/Ol1Rj [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Disaster Bob. Disaster Bob said: goodSchist » Earthquake Preparedness and a Reply to a Comment Online <a href="http://bit.ly/Ol1Rj" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/Ol1Rj</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yorrike (Yorrike)</title>
		<link>http://www.goodschist.com/2009/09/21/earthquake-preparedness-and-a-reply-to-a-comment-online/comment-page-1/#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator>Yorrike (Yorrike)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodschist.com/?p=381#comment-1136</guid>
		<description>Earthquake Preparedness and a Reply to a Comment Online http://bit.ly/wArzA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earthquake Preparedness and a Reply to a Comment Online <a href="http://bit.ly/wArzA" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/wArzA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
